Is it necessary to correct a peer who does not use person-first language?

The rationale for choosing the idea of "meeting them where they are at" aligns with the foundational principles of peer support. This approach emphasizes understanding and accepting individuals in their current state, including their use of language. The concept suggests that rather than immediately correcting someone’s language, which could create resistance or discomfort, it is more beneficial to engage them in conversation and support. This fosters a trusting relationship and encourages openness to learning.

Using person-first language is indeed important in promoting respect and dignity for individuals experiencing mental health challenges or other life situations. However, insisting on immediate correction may not be effective and can deter someone from feeling comfortable in sharing their thoughts. By prioritizing the relationship and communication, peer specialists can gently guide peers towards understanding the significance of person-first language over time, fostering a more meaningful dialogue about their experiences.

This perspective allows for organic learning moments that can emerge from discussing language use naturally, rather than through corrections that might be perceived as judgmental or confrontational.