In motivational interviewing, reflecting a peer's experience helps with which of the following?

Reflecting a peer's experience in motivational interviewing is instrumental in encouraging them to find their own solutions. This technique involves actively listening and then mirroring back to the individual what they have expressed. It not only demonstrates that the peer specialist is engaged and understanding but also facilitates deeper self-exploration.

When peers hear their thoughts and feelings reflected back, it often leads to an increased personal insight and clarity about their situation. This process empowers them to articulate their own solutions rather than relying solely on the peer specialist for direction. By affirming the peer's feelings and experiences, it helps them gain confidence in their ability to make choices that are right for them, fostering autonomy and promoting self-discovery.

The other options do not align with the primary goal of reflection in motivational interviewing. For example, deciding what should be done next tends to place the onus on the peer specialist, which contradicts the purpose of empowering the individual. Similarly, proving the counselor's expertise and judging the effectiveness of previous treatments focus more on the practitioner’s role rather than enhancing the peer's self-efficacy and personal agency.